![]() ![]() However, the minute jobs get archived and restored later to be revised, or things move to a new workstation, or a different drive, or even the same drive on different days (as noted above) it tends to create havoc. And yes, as long as I "don't touch anything", AMA is a quicker way to get material ingested and into the timeline. Then you only have to relink the sequence at the end as is done but thousands of facilities every day. The changes from the QT AMA plugin to the UME AMA plugin is a serious issue if you need to move between systems using those (not in this case)īut if you prefered the import route then AMA link and Transcode. Its possible to delete AMA management databases (stored on the boot drive) Its possible to disable AMA management, its an MC setting. But, as in your experience, it can cause issues. Normally this works really well and makes file based linked media more robust. ![]() So Avid has attempted to make AMA linking more like managed media in that Avid retains databases that remember where source files were when they were linked and adds additional metadata to help identify those files (beyond file names) If Avid AMA was dumb as it is in other NLEs then it would be a simple process to repoint master clips and sequences to the new locations.īut this does risk cross linking which can be a nightmare to unpick.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |